![screeny weeny 5.o screeny weeny 5.o](https://www.head-nature.com/pics/headshop/11188/1000/Screeny-Weeny-5.0-black---Circumsized.jpg)
![screeny weeny 5.o screeny weeny 5.o](https://www.smokedreams.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/screeny-weeny.jpg)
Including uncircumcised and multiple colors. Innovation: Finally a realistic looking penis! This device has 18 different models to choose from. UNREALISTIC: 12 POINTS REASON: Innovative heating element TOTAL SCORE: (only device to recieve 2 scores) REALISTIC SHOWER: 3 POINTS REASON: No fake penis. Which makes this device only suitable for fantasy play when realism is not an issue. Wonderful innovation! But it's drawback is that it only comes with a urine exit hose, no fake penis. Combined with a 9 volt battery, this device will keep your partner bathed in a body temperature golden shower for 8 hours. TOTAL SCORE: 7 POINTS REASON: Multiple use= pee pee pants The only problem is that after multiple use the valve tends to loosen up and begin to drip. This is a good change from the Whizz's original hose clip, which made a "clicking" sound during use. Innovation: A bite valve type urine actuator built into the fake penis. TOTAL SCORE: MINUS 10 points REASON: Cheap knock-off Just a way to capitalize on someone else's invention This device is nothing more than the Whizzinator repackaged by Serious Monkey Biz. I'm doing this to save time, but also because all, but one, of the rest of the devices are nothing but knock-offs of the Whizzinator. Included with these scores, I will talk briefly about any innovations they have. To shorten this blog and not waste a lot of time rehashing what has already been discussed, I am going to give you most of the devices final scores. Today, like all of it's knock-offs, the Whizz should never be used when trying to give a realistic golden shower. In 2016, the Whizz's fake porno penis can be spotted a mile away. But as its popularity grew, it became increasingly difficult to wear one of these comical costumes during wet sex play without being noticed. This device was innovative and pure genius, when it first hit the market. But as the bag emptied and lost pressure, the stream turned into a dribble.
![screeny weeny 5.o screeny weeny 5.o](https://www.head-nature.com/pics/headshop/11184/480/Black---Beauty.jpg)
Which allows the beginning stream to look OK. Just like most of devices I tested, the stream relied on gravity when urinating. This was the worst looking penis in this category. During testing I was unable to produce a sample at exact body temperature. How about while your naked? Absolutely.ĭevice relies on heat packs to achieve and maintain body temperature. Ability to wear this device while performing normal activities? Limited Could your partner see this device during an up close encounter? Definitely. Is the Whizzinator undetectable under clothing? Yes, depending on the clothing. The base components have changed little since it was first released, external urine bag, fake penis, Velcro and elastic belt and unreliable heat packs. As a matter of fact, every single urine replacement device on the market (except one) is designed on the same out of date Whizzinator platform. Because of its innovative and "outside the box" design it became very popular, very quickly. When Puck Industries first came out with this product, it was genius, pure and simple. Is the device likely to enhance or detract from your golden shower experience? How would you partner feel about using the device again? How would your partner feel about the use of the device during your wet sex play? When performing your golden shower, does it look realistic? Can your partner see the device during these up close and personal fetish games? Can you move about freely, without being encumbered by the device?ĭoes the device produce a realistic looking stream of urine? Strong stream? Steady stream? When performing a golden shower, was the device capable of supplying a urine stream at/close to 98.5 degrees? If you were invited to a P-Party, could you wear the device under normal clothing without detection? Could you dance, walk, sit and do other normal activities while wearing the device? If you found the right partner and circumstances, could you perform your urine tasks naked without the device being noticed? Each device receives a score of 1 (use at your own risk) to 5 (highly recommended)
#Screeny weeny 5.o series#
I then put each device through a series of tests, as described below. Monkey Dong by Serious Monkey Biz Price: $89.99Ħ.
![screeny weeny 5.o screeny weeny 5.o](https://i.hood.de/fit-in/3000x3000/filters:no_upscale()/images/41545/415459220.jpg)
The Urinator by Innovative Research Technology, Inc. The Whizzinator Touch by Alternative Lifestyles. The first thing I did was purchase one product from each of the top brands of urine replacement devices currently on the market. This week I set out to answer that question. Everyday my company, Sexxi Showers, receives at least one email asking me, "What makes my golden shower products better than my competition's?